I also have heard the audio of Kerry stating that he personally burned down villages, and committed war atrocities.   All you have to do is listen to Sean Hannity who plays it at least once a week.   There is no ambiquity in the audio.   Kerry clearly states he violated the geneva convention.

So who do you believe?   254 Swift vets have come out against Kerry.   16 have come out in support of Kerry.    Kerry won't comment but his staff has now stated that he may not of been in Cambodia in Christmas 1968, and that his first purple heart may have been from a self inflicted wound.    (Kerry's memory might be seared that Nixon was president in 1968, but all the history books are seared that he wasn't)   

So who do you believe?   Lets look at Kerry's response to the swift Boat ads.    Rather than confront them on the facts, their lawyers try to sue radio/tv stations to keep them off the air, and they now have hired private investigators to dig up dirt on the Swift Boats.   Did you know that one of the Swift Vets has a reckless driving violation. (That news came out today)   I guess that proves that me must have been lying about Viet Nam.

So who do you believe?    It seems to me that Kerry is doing all the things that make him like he is the one lying.   Last night O'reilly suggested that Kerry have a one time only press conference to answer all the Viet Nam questions and then refuse to discuss it anymore.   IN that way we could all move on from this quaqmire.   I think that is the best suggestion I have heard on this issue.