Mack, thanks for your remarks.

Guest, that article Wolfgang linked to was well-considered and deftly written. If the weight of the rhetoric here has become too heavy for you, you have only yourself to blame. You started using keywords that fit into scholarly discourse, leading me to believe that you spoke the language. It felt good to expand on the subject that was interestingly nuanced up to that point. Silly me, thinking you were actually particiapting in the discussion instead of blowing smoke. If you were hoping no one would call your bluff, you fooled yourself.

Enough said.

SRS