well, IF you can get to it, here is the transcript of an online chat hosted by a Post columnist in which he and reader comment...almost totally against the Post's decision. (as far as I can tell, there has been NO comment by the paper)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2626-2004Sep7.html

It begins:
"Gene Weingarten: Good afternoon.

Some very interesting business today.

The Washington Post has decided not to run this week's episode of Boondocks, instead substituting an old sequence. Moreover, when this chat requested permission to LINK to the censored material, which is available to any and all on the Boondocks website, permission was denied. The Washington Post has decided that it is inappropriate to disseminate this material in any way. Personally, this chat takes no position, pro or con, on this ruling, inasmuch as taking a position would amount to insubordination, a quality abhorrent to this chat. "