Once more, Little Hawk trying hard to prove that he can talk about things of which he has not the slightest knowledge.

Others have pointed out that you could not even get the definition of 'square' correctly. But is is even worse than that.

That's not science, it is a definition which could be changed. It is not an empirical result. It is like the definition of, say, 'arson' in law and law isn't a science. The definition of a square may be boring to you, but even the correct definition of a square would be no scientific fact.

Not each fact of life ("JFK has been murdered", "Canada lies north of the USA", "Carl Lewis has won nine gold medals", "the boat from ... to ... leaves at 8 45 in the morning") is scientific stuff.

Write about things like flowers, love, happiness and whatever but make sure you know what you are writing about. Of science you know nothing.

Wolfgang