I don't know if theses sources are approved or not but here are a few:

http://www.charleston.net/stories/051703/ter_17satellite.shtml
http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0429/p06s01-woiq.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2003/05/iraq-030528-rfel-163456.htm
http://www.spacewar.com/2004/040312041539.6t3c7l1v.html
http://www.dailyherald.com/special/iraq/wwi_paststory.asp?intID=3779791

Here are some links to the alleged oil for food scandal. I am not saying any of them are true. They could all be pro Bush propaganda.

http://www.brookesnews.com/040202saddamsbribes.html
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20040503-123158-1229r.htm
http://www.iht.com/articles/541766.html
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/9779443.htm?1c

Of course that Iraqi newspaper could not have published that list of 270 oil voucher recipients if that swaggering cowboy, Bush and his gang of henchmen had not falsified the edivence to invade Iraq. Kerry would have done the same thing in a more sensitive manner working thru the UN instead of working against the UN, Russia, Germany and France.

Of course I could be wrong about all of this. A smart person is not afraid to change his mind after he re-evaluates the situation.

Old Guy