beardedbruce, here's the thread with your posts asserting that allowing the UN inspectors to remain in Iraq do their job was responsible for weapons having been removed from Iraq prior to and during the US invasion of Iraq, and a quote from that thread:

Subject: RE: BS: Well, looky here...
From: CarolC - PM
Date: 16 Jun 04 - 10:46 AM

(beardedbruce- )

TRUE- and that is a result of the delay and attempt to get a consensus in the UN. If the US had acted unilateraly, without months of debate and warning, we might have found them still in place- but that is not how we do things.... I wonder why?

(me- )

"Not quite, beardedbruce. The UN inspectors were doing a good job of containing and eliminating Saddam's weapons. They wanted to finish the job they started. They warned that an attack on Iraq by the US (and the coalition of the coerced) before they finished the job, would probably accomplish the exact opposite of the results the US said it wanted (elimination of WMDs), and that, instead, whatever WMDs still existed would probably end up in the hands of the wrong people, including terrorists. And this appears to be exactly what has happened.

I'd say the UN inspectors were right about this one. We should have let them finish their job."

BS: Well, looky here... (Iraqi WMDs)