Ron,

You OBVIOUSLY do not understand ths SRS rule.

ANY fact which is presented can be judged SOLELY by the source. If the source is not of the proper viewpoint/bias, the fact is to be ignored, regardless of it's validity. This was established some time back, and the Mudcat community gave this rule it's full backing and support.

The item I had presented WAS direct quotes, but could not even be discussed, as the source site had been tainted by (shudder) conservative funding.


Thus, the biased sites that Amos insists on refering to cannot be used for any facts, even if the fact is true. We Would not want to violate the SRS Rule...