A

as usual, you do not address the citations brought up against you. The citation you have may certainly be true, but at the same time the ones showing he voted for Yucca numerous OTHER times may also be true. If you want to make a valkid arguement, address the points your oposition brings up, instead of persisting in personal attacks.

"I notice no source for your huge number of misleading citations."
Actually, OG did give his sources, if you bothered to read the post instead of just jumping to attack.

"How many repetitions does it take," Amos ", to make a falsehood sound true? How much bullshit do you have to pour on before it becomes a fact instead of just more of the same old crap?"

MOST of your statements have failed the SRS test, by being from blatently biased sites. I cannot give any credit to anything from THOSE sites, if the mere fact of something being on a conservative site is to be considered as invalidating the fact.