A

I do not disagree with you about the Washington Times- I read it trying to get all the viewpoints, not just the Post's. It IS conservative. But just because a source has a bias does not mean that one can discard all the facts it presents. A large number- and no, I have not counted them yet- of your sources are obviously biased to your viewpoint- and I would be willing to accept the facts that they ppresent, if the facts that I present from my sources were being accepted. But why should I consider ANYTHING from YOUR biased source, when you discount EVERYTHING from MY biased sources? I was taught to look at the facts, and try to determine what reality was, not pick and choose the "Facts" that support my viewpoint, and ignore the ones that do not. Being human, I sometimes fail- but at least I try, unlike a number of those here on mudcat who make no attempt to get both sides of any situation.