Burgermeister--

As I indicated elsewhere, you may possibly run into sarcasm here---watch out.

Obviously the Journal editorial page is dominated by Neanderthals (Bushites).

However if you'd bother to read the rest of the paper, the news articles constantly point out flaws, misstatements, and self-contradictions by Bush.

Virtually all my information for criticism of Bush has come from those articles.

For instance, by reading the Journal articles (not the editorials, which might possibly be slightly biased--imagine that!---) , I learned that there was virtually no link between Saddam and Osama--------and they printed this long before the invasion.

If Bush had not been determined from Day 1 to invade Iraq, there was a huge amount of information available not just to him but to the general public, to indicate that his flimsy
excuses for invading were smoke and mirrors.