First this thread died and went off of the list from lack of interest until you revived it.

Yes I am able to speak foul language unlike the Liberal elite (when the mike is on).

There is no link to MSNBC News 25 Oct 2004.
I can't find it on MSNBC so I have no idea what part of your post was by you and what part is by NBC. A pretty sloppy job of posting in view of the restrictions you place on others.

I have searched to find out what 2 programs Bush suspended but I can't find them so I am still only able to respond to the mixture of information and conjecture you posted.

Most Americans will accept a statement by MSNBC as objective.
All three networks gave Kerry 38% positive evaluations. But ABC gave Bush only 20% positive, compared to 30% at NBC and 35% at CBS.
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:6bJbYhaP8pAJ:www.cmpa.com/documents/04.10.20.ElectionWatch.pdf+Center+for+Media+and+Public+Affairs+at+George+Mason+University+&hl=en

What bearing do Hannity or Limbaugh have or your original post that we are repeatedly told to focus on?

I too am a registered Republican and I am not all that enamored with all of Bush's policies. My posts were anti-Kerry not pro Bush.

I feel honored to have my intelligence portioned out by someone of such superior intelligence. Therefore you will always think you have the upper hand and be faintly amused by lower class beings.

crucial quote is by Senator Domenici I don't regard a wondering as any thing crucial. It is not a statement.

I still assert that Russia should put no conditions on the US cleaning up their mess.

Your guy lost. Get over it.

You do not mention the links I posted about positive steps that bush has taken toward nuclear proliferation because it shoots holes in you botched anti-Bush posting that does not meet your own standards.

Smedly