On the subject of weakness:

Well now, let's see here.

On one hand we have somebody who always posts giving his own name, who stands behind every word he's ever written on Mudcat, and who believes that any movement which supports good principles should be applauded, not attacked.

On the other hand we have an equal-opportunity bigot who attacks virtually everybody on Mudcat, but who runs whining to higher authority when he thinks he is being impersonated (as if anybody would want to).

When they have encounters --(can't call them debates, since the second person 1) has no concept of debate and 2) can't seem to get out of the bathroom--his continuing obsession),--- the first one routinely and effortlessly slashes the second to ribbons, usually using sarcasm, which works like a charm.

The second person has also never once had the guts to sign his name to any of the pathetic drivel he constantly spouts.

I wonder which of them is the weaker. Sure is a tough choice.

But I'll have to go with Person #2--he wins the prize.

Congratulations, courageous "Martin".