I am amazed that both fellows are able to devote so much time to Mudcat. The back-and-forth between them at least opens one's mind up to the extremes of about every issue discussed.

I am favorably biased towards liking Amos because he researches his posts and those posts, although often biased, condense information that many of us can't take the time to do so ourselves.

Never fail, Martin Gibson will rebut whatever Amos says. His rebuttals would be meaningful if he took the time to research the contrary position and post it in a fair manner, even if he combined learned refutations with his usual scatological retorts.

Insanity is far too extreme a term for either; strong personalities would probably be fitting appellations for both.

Cruiser