The grounds for blocking me would be what exactly - that some of 'us' think it better that I were not allowed to post anymore - because 'we' don't think that I have anything 'constuctive' to say?

If I am accused of being paranoid - this sort of post may possibly be why? A post that ignores the issue and is a judgement only upon the worth of individuals invited to post here by Max - based only on (some of) what may have been seen of their posting done under their own name - my case since 1998.

It is probably made worse that some of those included and spoken for in this post as 'we' - do not choose to even use their own names when using this same judgement whilst imposing their censorship actions upon others (who may).

Is all this then really thought to be 'constructive? Could these unknown group of judges - in fact be the real 'troublemakers'?

While all this censorhip and judgement continues so do the abusive personal attacks. Not surprising as some of these personal attacks are mounted and defended by our volunteers. Many posters seeing this - honestly question IF any censorship is actually taking place to prevent it for many of the culprits - known to be the worst offenders over many years are still posting away (without any threats).

These posters are obviously thought to be 'constructive' and do not get the public animosity from our volunteers that seem reserved for anyone who seriously questions the wisdom of some of actions of our volunteers and suggests ways this could be improved. Mainly by a better example being given by our volunteers....