Oh give me a friggen break.......

1. I list my ideas and directions on where I'd like to see the country go.
2. I get mauled by Bobert and his sympathetic conformists on answering questions.
3. I get told that I'm "afraid" of answering a few questions that have absolutely nothing to do with any of the ideas mentioned in the first place.
4. I get accused of trying to STEER the conversation into topics that I "just love to preach about".
5. Upon answering so said "questions", I am now getting bulldogged into talking about "Nazi's in the Republican party." An accusation……IF TRUE…….has no bearing on my thoughts as an individual and ideas of where the country needs to go.

It's ME who is steering the conversation?

Bobert….I have no interest in hearing YOUR diatribe of how Nazi's in the GOP have anything to do with the current administration or any other ties that you would like to attempt to make. Now if that makes you unwilling to continue the talk anyway, then it's you, not me, of loving to hear yourself preach about what bad ideas these are. Once again, you are proving that you can sure talk the talk but when it comes to walking the walk, all you can do is complain how the other guy is fouling up the system. If these are such bad ideas then let's hear your opinion of how you would either change the system or move forward with what's been started. Preferably without going into a monologue of how you believe that Bush is the devil's spawn and is leading everybody down the path of destruction.   If you can do that, then we can truly have an intelligent conversation. So……with that said………you game?