I see your point, Amos. Alternatively, one could trisect an angle by merely bisecting it twice, yielding four equal angles, and then telling one of them to get lost. That would leave a vacuum within the original angle which, since nature abhors a vacuum, would cause the remaining three angles to swell equally, resulting in true trisection.

Dee epiphanies jus' keeps on rollin' in, duzn't dey?