One charge, she issued press release(s) to the press (where else) regarding her client's desires about a cease-fire in the Mideast, as I understand it, despite a court order not to commmunicate with the press, and despite her own express agreement not to do so. This had nothing to do with defending him in the case before the court.

There was another charge which I disremember, but as I recall it essentially represented (as did the above) instructions to his terrorist followers in the Mideast. Again, nothing which would be legitimate representation by a lawyer in defending a case.

Incidentally, there was NO denial that she had done these acts.

Dave Oesterreich