There was another thread I asked Joe to review. I felt like it should be closed, but I had participated in it. Hence I felt as though someone else should make the decision. Mudelf

The imposed deletion referred to by our anonymous volunteer judge was done as they state - by using the general guidelines. However it follows that for anyone else to have approved the decision to delete - the deletion must have first been made.

The other thread referred to was different - the decision to impose deletion appears here to have been made by Joe. Perhaps our nameless volunteer is setting a better and more sensible example than their 'senior admin person' - in not imposing any editing action upon threads they themselves have contributed to?

Under these general guidelines (whatever they are) - I would assume that Joe's personal attacks and incitement for others to do this - should also have qualified for imposed editing action?