Winick's article is interesting, but looking back over this thread, it appears that the theory he's trying to prove, i.e. MacColl's de facto authorship of the revival "Reynardine", has been pretty much the accepted wisdom around here.

Nerd, is he saying the same thing you are? And what are the odds of two major papers on the same folk subject should be published at the same time?

Cheers,
Michael