If you're certain Susan, then I stand corrected. It just seems to me that both sides(except perhaps for the parents) have a myriad of interests, mostly selfish, beyond what is best for the patient. And if nothing else, the case should serve as a good poke in the ribs with a sharp stick to those (of any age) who haven't a living will.

While I (hopefully) properly value the sanctity of life, I know I sure didn't work a lifetime at a job I dislike just to see my life-savings go to fill the coffers of some hospital. My children have been instructed that when that time comes, they are to load me on my motorcycle one last time, lock the throttle wide open, and point me at the nearest tree or cliff (life insurance policy with double indemnity for accidental death). Failing that, there is always the Living Will to fall back on.