Susu's Hubby said to CarolC:

Please don't read it while still in your liberal frame of mind. You'll just get confused with the true facts.

What a self-serving, dismissive piece of trash you've contributed, "Hubby." Anything you don't agree with is in quotes, and your "facts" are the accurate ones, right? Except you can't remember some of the names "( sorry, I forgot their names)" or figures "A number that I actually quoted in one of my first posts on the Cat (if my memory serves me correctly)" or places. . . or the truth. If you're going to trounce people with what is your dilusional version of the truth, pal, you should at least go back and check your own facts!

Hubby said:

Here is where I will state that although the number of civilians killed is still way too many, civilians do get killed in war. Don't forget 9/11/01 and 12/7/41. 6000+ of our innocent people were killed.

What Bullshit. Are you adding these events from sixty years apart? Or are you saying each one had that many dead? Talk about a disorganized argument. You're good at inflation--the kind of man Dubya wants on his team. The latest authoritative figure for September 11, 2001 is under 3,000. 2,977 comes up at a topical encyclopedia site Wikipedia.

I've seen your name a couple of times around here, and in the 126 posts you've contributed so far, not a single one has to do with MUSIC, the raison d'être of this place. I can see we're not going to get along, for a lot of reasons.

And you needed to start a new thread for this, eh?

SRS

(And they still don't add up to 6000 when lumped together, since Pearl Harbor was 2,403).