But when there is not a written contract, and there are dissenters, it becomes necessary for the courts to decide (as they have). The fact that in a democracy such as ours there is other recourse is not a bad thing. Having been the victim of a fixed trial myself, I have less faith in the supremacy of the judiciary. I like the notion that there is an ability to appeal a court's decision. I like the idea that the legislative branch can check and balance the judiciary.

When the courts see it your way it is easy to want to grant them sovereinty. Wait until they decide against you and then talk to me of their wisdom.

Incidentally, I'm conflicted about this case -- but I'm not conflicted about the efficacy of a true living will. If there had been a true living will, this whole case would not even be happening.