Thanks, Jon. So we're in an evidence-free zone as regards Joe's misdeeds.

Roger, if this was a court of law and you were the prosecuting attorney, I believe the judge would have thrown the case out long ago (Richard Bridge could tell us about that). And if you were persisting in producing more flimsy non-evidence of this kind, he might have even charged you with contempt of court or wasting the court's time.

(bracing myself for the next avalanche of "evidence" now...) ;-)