The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #77879   Message #1470992
Posted By: The Shambles
26-Apr-05 - 05:54 AM
Thread Name: BS: Censorship on Mudcat
Subject: RE: BS: Censorship on Mudcat
Funny how we sometimes say so much to say so little.

Yes but I am not really too sure how funny it is. For some of even invent an entire bogus membership to start an entire thread to say very little that they honestly feel………

Mudcat Censorship – a proposal


But have you not heard? It's official – I am NOT the problem any more (if I ever was).

Subject: RE: BS: Mudcat censorship - a proposal
From: Big Mick - PM
Date: 02 Apr 05 - 08:31 PM

The alteration it needs must occur in the minds of the folks that respond to this stuff. Roger is entitled to his opinion, and in virtually every posters response they have indicated they are tired of his restating the same thing over and over; they are tired of him twisting quotes to serve himself; they go on and on about how he goes on and on. Do you folks learn anything? Who is worse, Roger or you? The question to Roger about who is "we" has been asked over and over.

Roger isn't the problem anymore. Those that feed him are.

Mick


And remember Catspaw's always profound advice (to others) - QUIT FUCKIN' WITH THE AARDVARK!

Mick and Jeri (as far as we know) are setting a better example or at least if they are posting - they are not posting under their real names.