Please give some examples of the "too many" you refer to Bill.

There are people who are sincere in their beliefs and they are not always looking for trouble... just sincere likeminded people who may be looking for other sincere likeminded people to share a particular belief with.

Politics doesn't seem to be banned. Posting a sincere comment about a topical discussion over the christian belief in a coming of a Chirstian anti-christ is far from the end of the world.

Art Bell, did a show on the Anti-christ, and nobody got him kicked off the radio for doing. So lighten up! You have you bias as I do. You otherwise are most likely a decent person, so please let a few things slip, without making yourself out as the final arbitrator here over coreect and in-correct postings, its a waste of your time and life as well as mine.

Everybody has their push buttons, you pushed mine when you were complaining about my going to far in my anti-christ postings, while at the same time endorsing, bush bashing threads and profuse use of porfanity, two things which are just as offensive to me, should I ever care to complain to you about them.


Joe Offer shared his Catholism here, and I for one was not offended by it.

If the topics is "Bush-bashing" there seems to be alot of heartily uncensored contributions. For you, this might NOT be taking it "too far" But who made you judge and jury.

There are conservatives on the cat too, that could scream, "You are taking this too far, as a conscervative I am offended! Please ban this guy!"

Banning of any kind is stupid and not necessary, it just adds to the problem more than resolves it. Let people have their say You don't have to contribute anything to the discussion you do not like or agree with.

I don't like the swearing and the dirty talk, but I lived with it while I was here on the cat, and didn't send you PM's trying to ban this orthat person from their own stupidity.

Who here hasn't done something stupid or opinionated!

Bush political threads are stupid and opinionated. Could this be the "too many" you are referring to?

Taking it "too far"

Formerly Dewey (who still has a life, and will not burden this message board)