Has anything else changed (for the better) - as result of recent mistakes on our forum by our volunteers? Mistakes that were thought necessary to be corrected?

The future of the 100th post itself - was never in danger. All that was in question is/was - who decided the content of it.

If this content is/was not judged by our anonymous volunteers to be to their personal taste - the volunteer now referred to now as our Chief Administrator - considered that although such judgement was not important enough for them - it was "fair game" for their underlings to impose their judgement upon the contributions of their fellow posters as a matter of routine in these cases - without the originator's knowledge or permission.

This was before our Chief Administrator later thought it important enough to reverse such an imposition by an anonymous volunteer.