Until things get straightened out, note that the list of posts that appears at the beginning of each thread appears to show the posts in the order in which they appear.

It is much easier to scan the dates shown there to see if the sequence is scrambled than it is to scroll through the posts to try to sort things out. A quick check at the top of the page will usually tell if a post is incomprehensible for the usual "personality" reasons, or because the posts are out of order; and will frequently let you find the nearest few preceding or following to make (sometimes) better sense of the conversation.

In addition to out-of-order listings, there do seem to be quite a few missing individual posts, and especially in longer threads the original (first) post to the thread seems fairly often to be among the missing. While some will be annoyed at not being credited for threads they started, others may be eternally grateful...

Perhaps, while things are being fixed, we need a game to identify places where threads make better (or different) sense because the posts are out of order. A few threads always did look like they were written by the proverbial ten thousand monkeys.

John