Leeneia,

If you reread your post and my critique of your post you'll see that my only point was your way of argumentation. Your argumentation showed that had not understood what the research was really about for otherwise you would not have attacked it with arguments that do not make sense in that context.

You may be mad about labeling and about how the media report an article but if you give words to your negative emotion which amount to a critique of an article which is an invalid critique you may expect that to be pointed out.


Wolfgang