So if a male has an attraction to another male and that is considered natural and they are free to conduct themselves as they see fit because it is their right under the Charter of Rights".

A paedophile has an attraction to a child, is that any less natural ???.

A Kleptomaniac has a natural urge to steal - is his rights being trampled on if we don't allow it, after all to him stealing is natural.

What about arsonists, a natural urge to get their kicks out of flres, surely these tendencuies are just as natural to all others. Where do we draw the line. Is there any possibility that at some future date the illegality of these natural urges will be challenged under the Charter of Rights. After all one cannot be discriminated agains because of sexual orientation.

I still maintain that a gay union is not the same as a straight union and should have it's own designation and no one will ever change my mind on that.