Contrary to Shambles' belief, nothing sinister goes on here.

I am not sure that I have said there was anything sinister going on. But it is usually the case that if you have nothing to hide - then there is thought to be little need for any secrecy. There is certainly no need for anyone to ever abuse their position of trust. It may well be a belief shared by many - that 'nothing sinister goes on here' but given all this needless secrecy - some folk could perhaps be forgiven for suspecting otherwise?

But if it is really the case that there is nothing sinister going on - where is the need for unknown numbers of those volunteers - who feel themselves qualified to impose their personal judgement upon the contributions of their fellow posters? And why do these volunteers remain anonymous - when anonymous posting on our forum is generally thought not to be a good thing?