LOL, GUEST tAnnywheeler, but it seems that we may be headin' fir yet another defense based on "Depends what the defination of IS... is"... This morning's Washington Post has yet another article on the scandel which is clearer than anything I've read yet.. That's not good for Rove whose attorney is tryin' desperately to keep the issue so muddled that no-one can see it fir what it is..

One thing I can say is that the "Yeah, I heard that, too" defense that Rove's attorney is using now ain't gonna hold up but might get them to the appointment of thwe Supreme and buy them some time... All they are tryin' to do is run out the clock at this point in time...

But the leak came from someone in the Bush administartion and tryin' to blame the press fir the leak, accordin' to the Wes Ginny Slide Rule, is pirdy danged lame...

"Yeah, I heard it, too"??????

My butt...

Bobert