He doesn't need to pre-judge any case when he answers a basic question about his views on privacy as they are understood according to the constitution.

Guest G said Things I don't understand at all are statements like;

"At least he has more brains than Clarence Thomas".

Now, how can anyone say that and have the evidence to back it up.

I'd say that your average golden retreiver has more brains than Clarence Thomas, and a lot more character. That's a no-brainer.

SRS