Dianavan certainly has quick access to sources of information denied to most of us. It would never have crossed my mind that the Jews were responsible for the Sharm-el Sheik bombings. But curiously, Dianavan has denied that that post implies anything about Israeli invovement. So what on earth can it mean? It's all very confusing.
    Did'nt Lawrence of Arabia capture Sharm-el-Sheik with his Arab irregulars once? Maybe he's had a hand in this.