I agree that they should be writing about it- but your conclusion is like the certainty some in the South had that someone was guilty of a crime because of the color of their skin. "Just because he is a neo-con..." As I said, what was the crime that he commited? The law about covert agents STATES 5 years, and she had been overt for 8- so there was no law broken.... But hell, let's lynch the n*... I mean Neo-con anyway.



I think the matter should be investigated- But I find it interesting how many here who supported Clinton's felony perjury seem to think that people should be held accountable for their crimes... ( not a comment to Azizi, as do not know her opinion of that matter,)