The harm done was that the polite and respectful action of first asking the originator was not undertaken before the still anonymous volunteer poster imposed their judgement selectively and unfairly upon that thread title in isolation and not others.

Further harm was done because had the originator been first asked - the 'UK' would not have been incorrectly added because the information the thread contained did not apply to the UK.

Perhaps the originator should be the one who judges whether harm is done or not. Perhaps they should also be due an apology when they are clearly seen to have been unfairly treated?

Considerable harm is done to the credibility of our forum if these incorrect imposed judgements by anonymous fellow posters are still to be defended (as if they had in fact clarifed anything or been fairly and generally imposed) and anyone one who may object to this needless imposition is subject to abuse and name-calling for just expressing and evidencing this view.

The manner of which the title change was needlessly imposed on this thread and the harm done to any attempt at of impartiality and posters being treated equally by our volunteer fellow posters - rather speaks for itself.....