Shambles said / asked:

"But we still don't know who you are - it is difficult to judge if you deserved better treatment or not."

Shouldn't anonymous fellow posters be treated the same as named fellow posters - does knowing the name of someone allow another someone to say whether or not the person deserved to be treated as they have been treated, or can one not accept that, because someone feels they have been treated badly then, in their eyes at least, they have been treated badly....

Is Shambles really suggesting here that people's behaviour might, in certain circumstances, make it ok for other people to treat them in a particular way, based on their individual reaction to that behaviour? Noo...surely not. For surely, backstage personnel have a similar role to play (as representatives of the management) as, say, the Joe Clones have here - and, therefore, should be completely impartial and whiter than white......   

(tongue only partly in cheek) apologies for off-threading