perhaps I would NOT care to reply to your claims, since I have stated numerous times that I do not agree that there is a problem. Only you seem to notice a problem

"This is your assumption and these are your words - they are not mine."
Just as Pat Robertson didn't really mean to suggest we should assassinate Hugo Chavez? Splitting hairs does not change the implication of what you claim....


Perhaps YOU would care to explain who those folks are, who are not replying for fear of being abused?

*back to sitting on my hands, as I feel sometimes I am debating a robot Turing program*