The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #83090   Message #1550354
Posted By: The Shambles
26-Aug-05 - 12:54 PM
Thread Name: In the UK......? (thread title change complaint)
Subject: RE: In the UK......? (thread title change complain
Grant our members and guests the serenity to accept the things they cannot change - the courage to change the things they can - and the wisdom to realise that this is a forum open to the public and that they have no control over the posts and ideas of others
-Wesley S

Joe Offer said - in a conventional post as a fellow poster.

Learn to live with it. We change thread titles because we want to change thread titles, and because most people seem to appreciate it. You say changing thread titles is offensive to the creator of a thread - but this is so only because you assert it to be so. Changing a thread title is not a power thing or suppression or censorship or anything like that. It's just indexing threads so people can find information in them. We're not intentionally offending anyone - we're just doing something you don't want us to do. You are offended because you have chosen to be offended. That's all. Get over it.

Let us leave our forum to judge things like how much notice to take of whether most people appreciate imposition being undertaken upon others. However, the issue is not one of a change to a thread title but one of risking offence by the routine practice of anonymous volunteer fellow posters automatically imposing this change upon their fellow posters without their knowledge or permission.

Now that we have anonymous volunteer fellow posters who can impose any change to a selected orignator's thread title as and when they want to - would it be possible and would it be a good idea for clarification purposes - to always indicate to our forum - where and when such an imposition has taken place and who was responsible?

This would avoid the current situation where there is a current thread title that has had a change imposed upon it by an anonymous volunteer fellow poster but which is now less clear and more incorrect as a result of this imposition - but where the title is still credited to its originator? Perhaps as such imposition looks now to be a fact - such action should be seen to be more accountable?