The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #84363   Message #1557862
Posted By: McGrath of Harlow
06-Sep-05 - 03:41 PM
Thread Name: BS: Faith Based Disaster Relief! Ta Da!!!
Subject: RE: BS: Faith Based Disaster Relief! Ta Da!!!
Some dictionaries stick in that "unlawful" stuff into their definitions, but others don't, or give that as an examnple of where the term might be appropriate.

In fact I can think of plenty of perfectly lawful activities where the term can be used - covering up for some dodgy but legal activity of a friend, for example. Or even organising a surprise party, though perhaps that's an atypical example.

But generally if you are engaged in something you'd rather other people didn't knowm about I think the term is appropriate, even when it ain't actually illegal, I think the term is appropriate.

And when it comes to terrorist atrocities, or assassinations (leaving aside the theoretical case where just one person is entirely responsible), by definition a conspiracy of some sort has to be involved, or they wouldn't happen in the first place. So it's absurd to talk as if theories about conspiracies were always nonsense. A whole host of conspiracy theories are nonsense, but that's a different matter.

And sometimes high authorities do in fact organise conspiracies, and it's a long time before the truth comes out - for example the Gulf of Tonkin incident