http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/ns.htm

This site and associated articles that Guest (who are you Guest?) refers to is not really a science site at all as far as I can tell.

I think the case for excluding ID from science lessons is well made above.

It is essential that ID is opposed. People who support it want to tell lies to children and that is not good.

Opposition is not simple. Arguing the detail of Darwinian evolution is not going to work, creationists, like most of us, don't understand it.

Perhaps the big picture is easier to paint. All of science is coherent, their are no contradictios between the various branches. In fact very much the opposite, knowledge and understanding in chemistry and physics help to further understanding in life sciences and vice verca.

The only disputes are at the frontiers of science where knowledge is few, new or odd. Their is simply far to much evidence, coherent with the rest of science, for Darwinian evolution to not be the best bet, and that's basically what science explanations are.