"I disagree about there not being anything we can do about GW"

But you still do not make any effort to LOOK at what GW will do, and reduce the disruption.

I do not say there is no GW, but see little EVIDENCE that there is
"any hard evidence that there is statistical correlation AND causal connection between" GW and man-made emmissions. Have you ever looked at volcanic activity? What is the tonnage of man-made emmissions, and what is the "natural" amount? Do you consider methane from cattle? Why not demand a no-beef diet?

Amos,
"The information is more than adequate in the case of our gradually warming environment, but is often rejected by those who do not wish to believe hard science;"

Evidence of what? Global warming? THAT is not in dispute- It is the amount of change to GW that can be affected by man-kind that is under discussion.

You have STILL missed my point about finding a solution for the IMPACT of global warming, instead of figuring that all will be well once we reduce emmisions. THAT is what I do not see any evidence for, yet hear as a mantra of many people here.