Not wearing seatbelts, or using mobile phones, hardly equates with violent abuse, threat, and intimidation of ethnic, religious, or political groups, does it?

Why is it that you, who are so insistent on others discussing YOUR issues, will never give a straight answer to a straight question?

It is, as you say, not rocket science. A simple yes or no will do.

Is it your contention that it is in the wider public interest that the intimidation of sections of the public should pass not only unpunished, but unhindered by the legal authorities?

Don T.