Yeah, and they all listen to Mark From Michigan too.

They (conservatives) want a court that will uphold the constitution and not write law from the bench. The fact that that is more important to them than one issue (like RvW) -- and that they just demonstrated that fact beyond a doubt, in full light of day, for anyone to observe, clearly shows the fallacy of SRS's contention that they would do otherwise, no?

That you think that the constitution has "no guns" and "abortion" clauses, and would support a court that saw the constitution that way....and you call that "wishing for a court to uphold the constitution".

...and I see a constitution that protects individual's property rights (among other things that the left half of the court now does not believe constitutional) and would wish for a court that saw it that way....and I call that "wishing for a court to uphold the constitution".