Forget it, Lads and Lasses. There are, it is glaringly obvious, those who would applaud GW bush no matter what shitty ploy he [nominally] led. The up front spokespersons in the U.N. asssembly haven't dared as yet to slap the TRUTH down on the table;the United Nations Organisation is, and ever has been, a mere tool of convenience for the puppeteers of the more acquisitive elements in the U.S.of A. On only one occasion were the forces of Uncle Sam ever close to being 100% participants in a U.N. operation, and that was in the matter of maintaining a land bridgehead on the continent of Asia, namely in Korea. A genuine United Nations force was deployed there. Anybody care to examine the composition of the "residue" of this force still hanging around South Korea today? Darfur doesn't concern Bush and co. Materials are much more important than people, especially in foreign climes. Who has any doubt at all of what would happen if the US had to make a choice between the real United Nations Org. and the purely militaristic North Atlantic Treaty Organisation? They could make that choice tomorrow, by the way, and be certain of the fawning compliance and co-operation of Tony Bliar and his henchman-of-Straw. But no- body else of any material import, thank God.So the good folks who are persistently attempting to counsel the inexplicably right-wing brainwashed who are still [again inexplicably]professing support and approval of the Whitehouse-Pentagon-Tony and the Creeps conglomerate should simply give up, and see if they continue, in mutual congratulation, to contribute the pro-war claptrap to this thread.
I'm finished with it, anyway. You can't talk to stone walls.