Hmmm. Well, I have no opinion about Indigo children at this point. None. Nada.

The only thing I can contribute is that I have seen 2 photographs that show auras. One was taken recently of a friend of mine, Lucy, and the picture was snapped using my digital camera, but I didn't snap it. The young daughter of another person did. We noticed the aura about half an hour later, when looking back through the various photos that had been taken that afternoon. There is unquestionably a pink, cloudy aura all around the top of Lucy's head. Pretty neat!

That got me looking around more alertly at other photos in the next few days, and I found one with a clearly discernable aura, not pink this time, but more like just a body of clear white light around the person's head.

I can offer no explanation other than this: both Lucy and the other individual have been applying themselves very much to spiritual development. It would not surprise me if they have strengthened their auric fields in the process.

There are numerous other photos of Lucy and the other person, and I have not seen auras in any of them.

And for that, I have no explanation either. All I can say is this: the auras in those first 2 photos are quite obvious, and I seriously doubt that they are anything BUT auras. What I mean by that is: they are not some other kind of light effect, given the settings and circumstances of those photos.

This should not be taken as a comment on Indigo children. I have no comment on Indigo children.

I've read Neale Donald Walsch's books, and I think they're very good.