lets face it, petr, youve lost this one...
the Bush administration has not been caught lying about not using chemical weapons, in a war fought largely because of Iraqs (asserted by the UN) chemical and other wmd programs, considered by the UN to be a threat, and prohibited by the UN resolutions and cease-fire terms.






"So what if theyre not signatories to some agreement, then its ok? By that argument Saddam could say he didnt sign any such agreement and no one would have the right to invade... "

Except HE DID- the cease-fire terms WHICH HE AGREED TO specifically prohibited that, and a number of other things that he then proceded to acquire. So, you are wrong, again.