The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #86374   Message #1611616
Posted By: dianavan
22-Nov-05 - 08:21 PM
Thread Name: BS: Chemical Weapons in Iraq
Subject: RE: BS: Chemical Weapons in Iraq
Thanks, Wolfgang. I thought this was pretty revealing:

"But white phosphorus is both incendiary and toxic. The gas it produces attacks the mucous membranes, the eyes and the lungs. As Peter Kaiser of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons told the BBC last week: "If ... the toxic properties of white phosphorus, the caustic properties, are specifically intended to be used as a weapon, that of course is prohibited, because ... any chemicals used against humans or animals that cause harm or death through the toxic properties of the chemical are considered chemical weapons."

I guess he hasn't talked to Artbrooks, who insists that "it is an obscurant and an incendiary."

Most importantly, "...we shouldn't forget that the use of chemical weapons was a war crime within a war crime within a war crime. Both the invasion of Iraq and the assault on Falluja were illegal acts of aggression. Before attacking the city, the marines stopped men "of fighting age" from leaving. Many women and children stayed: the Guardian's correspondent estimated that between 30,000 and 50,000 civilians were left. The marines treated Falluja as if its only inhabitants were fighters."

I am disgusted with the actions of the U.S. government and it's military. Until they are tried for war crimes, the U.S. will continue its downhill decline. A new election will not fix this.