I read the BBC article. It would be a good one to take to English class as an example of careless and inflammatory journalism.

For example, the references to:

guitar licks - does the reporter even know what a guitar lick is? many licks have been around for a long time

the move - what move was that, exactly?

jail time - judges don't put people in prison just because rich white men want them to. There are sentencing guidelines in the law. What do they say?

Meanwhile, I can understand music publishers wanting to be paid for their product. If the issue is money, why don't they work out a way to get money from the websites? Duh!