Roger, having been unfrocked, do you really need to parade your nakedness in front of all and sundry? Two posts back (yours of 11:02 AM) you told Graham that he doesn't know what he is talking about, when he claims that PPL has zero relevance to copyright, and post a link to make your point.

Well, I read the article pointed to by the link, and guess what it says: that PPL has zero relevance to copyright; that copyright owners get paid by PRS, and that PPL pays performers (not copyright owners).

We know you cannot write properly. But comprehending a simple 20-line piece of text shouldn't be beyond someone who writes so prolifically.

Go back and read your own references, you dolt.