Please note the following statement by Blix, in the above report:

"UNMOVIC, for its part, is not presuming that there are proscribed items and activities in Iraq, but nor is it – or I think anyone else after the inspections between 1991 and 1998 – presuming the opposite, that no such items and activities exist in Iraq. Presumptions do not solve the problem. "


What part of "but nor is it(UNMOVIC) ... presuming the opposite, that no such items and activities exist in Iraq." do you have a problem understanding?